May's Article Summary
Article:
Substitution of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages with Other Beverage Alternatives: A
Review of Long-Term Health Outcomes
Zheng, Miaobing. Et al. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition
and Dietetics, Volume 115, Issue 4, 767-779.
Article Link: http://www.andjrnl.org/article/S2212-2672(15)00112-4/pdf
There is a large number of evidence supporting the
association between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and an increase in caloric
intake and weight gain. Past literature has also shown a link between the
consumption of SSBs and type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular
diseases. The review defines SSBs as the following: calorie containing
carbonated drinks, fruit-flavored drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks, and
vitamin water drinks. SSBs exclude 100% juices. Considering the health concerns
that have been linked to SSB consumption, some cities have even passed soda
taxes as an effort to deter consumers from purchasing the caloric dense
beverages. In the past, alternatives to SSBs have been recommended as a way of
consuming less calories. Proposed as alternatives are water, artificially
sweetened beverages (ASBs), coffee, tea, 100% fruit juices, and milk. While
these seem like logical replacements, the long-term health outcomes are
unclear, thus, the reason for this review of the literature.
The research article for this month is a review of the
long-term health outcomes of substitutions of SSBs. The study included six
prospective cohort studies and four randomized control trials. Studies that
included modification of multiple health behaviors and education programs on
reducing SSBs alone were excluded from the study to help prevent bias. After
analyzing the ten articles included, the study outcomes were divided into:
total energy intake, body weight and composition, type 2 diabetes, stroke, and
other health outcomes.
Both a cohort and a RCT study examined the replacement of
SSB with the total energy intake. Over a 12-month period, the replacement with
water or low-calorie beverages showed a mean decrease in calories/day of
140-200 kcals. However, there was no significant difference in energy
consumption when replacing SSB with milk and 100% juices. When looking at body
weight and composition, two cohort studies and four RCTs evaluated those
variables. The replacement of SSBs with water or low-calorie beverages was
associated with weight loss over a 12 month period. In fact, it was predicted
that replacement of all SSBs with water would produce a 3.0 kg weight loss, 3.4
cm waist circumference loss, and a decrease of 1.9% in waist circumference over
12 months. Two cohort studies also showed beneficial effects of substation of
SSB on risk of T2DM. Similarly, there were beneficial effects on the incidence
of stroke when substituting SSBs.
Overall, there may be beneficial health outcomes when
substituting SSB with water and low-calorie beverages in the diet. The outcomes
are not as significant when milk and 100% fruit juices are used as
replacements.
Since the review study excluded education impacts, a
supplemental article examining the impacts of providing caloric information on
SSBs was included. The target of the study were low-income Black neighborhoods
in Baltimore and the data was collected on Black adolescents. Signs were posted
indicating the number of calories, teaspoons of sugar, and number of
minutes/miles needed to run to burn off the drink. The results showed that
adolescents of this study significantly reduced their purchasing of the
highlighted drinks.
Additional
article:
Bleich, S. N., Barry, C. L.,
Gary-Webb, T. L., & Herring, B. J. (2014). Reducing sugar-sweetened
beverage consumption by
providing caloric information: how black adolescents alter their purchases and whether the effects persist. American Journal of Public Health, 104(12),
2417.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home