January 2015 Summary
Question
1: How could policies be changed to
promote food production that would support the dietary guidelines? How can we
as dietitians help make this happen?
Changing government policies was another popular suggestion. Both benefits and detriments to taxing nutritionally sparse foods were mentioned. While there is merit to both sides of this argument, it is unlikely the companies who profit from these foods will allow these taxes to be implemented. Some of you want to change policies regarding government subsidies; Jessica is uncomfortable asking the government to intervene. As Sammy said, the government already subsidizes unhealthy foods such as corn and soybeans much more than healthy foods. One possible resolution is to remove the existing subsidies and allow nutrient dense foods a better opportunity to be financially competitive. Regardless of the policies we support, our role is to advocate for them.
Question 2: If the food supply produced the quantity and variety of food that would allow every American to purchase food to meet their nutritional needs as defined by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, do you think they would? If not, what are the barriers that would prevent this from happening and what could dietitians do to help people overcome these barriers?
Everyone agrees that not all Americans would be willing to
meet the Dietary Guidelines even if the appropriate food existed to accomplish
that. Many of us agree that the easy accessibility, cheap price and perceived
better taste of unhealthy food makes it preferred by the majority. We also
thought that educating Americans on healthy choices, why they are important,
and quick and easy preparation methods would have a positive impact. Caroline
mentioned that people may lack the desire to consume a nutritious diet, and
that one reason for this is the stereotype that nutritious food does not taste
good. Sammy mentioned the perception that eating healthy is “hard”. Both of
these are perceptions we need to change by persuading people to try healthy
foods and to listen when we educate them on meal planning, shopping and cooking
strategies. Unfortunately, even if they listen, as Jessica said, knowledge does
not dictate behavior, and some will not be willing to change.
We have determined that food companies will not change
unless it is profitable; it is not profitable unless the demand changes; and the
demand will not change unless we persuade the population to change their eating
habits, or as Gina said, recreate “normal” dietary patterns. Our success at
changing dietary patterns of Americans has been limited in the past, so it may
require more motivation for some people than what can be provided by dietitians.
That motivation could come from government interventions for farmers or food
companies, or, as Jessica mentioned, from insurance companies who reward a
healthy lifestyle or penalize an unhealthy lifestyle.
Question 3: The gaps between the food supply and the DGA have
been relatively consistent over 40 years, although there has been some
change. Why do you think the US has not been able to create a significant
decrease in the gaps, even though they have been identified and continue to be
monitored?
Most of us agreed that the gaps are not a priority of either
food corporations or the government. Caroline also mentioned restaurants, which
have an agenda similar to that of food corporations; they want to generate
maximum profits. Susan and Gina both mentioned that because food corporations
generate profit, they are financially able to influence government legislation
through lobbying, thus preventing government policies that will limit their
profitability. Caroline pointed out that large food processors are also able to
spend the money to market their products to consumers, creating demand for those
products. In addition, eating healthier may not be a priority for people who
are concerned about providing basic necessities for their families, as Jessica alluded
to. Between the demand created by marketing efforts and the lack of interest in
changing due to many barriers, either perceived or real, the progress that has
been made is an indication of considerable hard work by dietitians and others
interested in improving the nutritional status of Americans.
Recommendations for practice:
The journal
article recognizes that progress toward a food system producing food to support
healthy eating will require changes in a number of aspects of our food
environment. In answering the questions,
respondents discussed several ideas that would assist in the changes necessary
to improve our food environment. This dialogue mostly focused on educating
individuals and families to make healthier choices and use those choices to provide
healthy meals, thus increasing demand for healthy foods. In addition, some
discussion proposed changing government policies. The article also recommends
changes in the type and quantity of food produced, where and how it is
produced, and a variety of agricultural factors. These are things that we as
dietitians can only affect through educating individuals and advocating for
appropriate legislation. In order to
accomplish these goals, we first need to educate ourselves about all the
different factors involved in our food system and how they interact.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home